Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
56
Features
57
Overall
56

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Released August 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-510
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Introduced August 2011
  • Older Model is Sony NEX-3
  • Refreshed by Sony NEX-F3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-520 was manufactured 4 years prior to the NEX-C3 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-520 matches up against the NEX-C3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony NEX-C3

 E-520 NEX-C3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-520

 NEX-C3 E-520 
IntroducedAugust 2011August 2008Fresher by 36 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony NEX-C3

 E-520 NEX-C3 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 features external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-520 and the NEX-C3.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and NEX-C3 is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and NEX-C3.

As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will give you more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-C3
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
73
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography factors
Sony NEX-C3 Street photography factors
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
79
tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors (225 grams)
does not have image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Sports photography camera
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery life (650 shots)
has phase detect auto focus
slow fps (4.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
53
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good battery life (400 shots)
max frames per second very slow (6.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography information
Sony NEX-C3 Travel photography information
52
good battery life (650 per charge)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
good battery life (400 shots)
lighter than competitors (225 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-C3 Landscape photography details
58
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (650 CIPA)
small screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
70
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (400 per charge)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging highlights
Sony NEX-C3 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
27
lighter than competitors (225g)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony NEX-C3
 Olympus E-520Sony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-520 Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2008-08-20 2011-08-22
Physical type Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 pounds) 225 gr (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 73
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.2
DXO Low light rating 548 1083
Other
Battery life 650 shots 400 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $400 $343