Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-510
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Released September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 versus Sony QX1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-520 was launched 7 years earlier than the QX1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-520 matches up versus the QX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony QX1

 E-520 QX1 
Screen dimension2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-520

 QX1 E-520 
ReleasedSeptember 2014August 2008Newer by 73 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony QX1

 E-520 QX1 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 enjoys external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Sony QX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 compared to the QX1.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and QX1 is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and QX1.

To sum up, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony QX1 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
59
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
66
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography information
Sony QX1 Street photography information
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
includes touch focus
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (216 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography advice
Sony QX1 Sports photography advice
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
great battery power (650 CIPA)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
56
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good battery power (440 shots)
slow fps (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Travel photography camera
52
great battery power (650 per charge)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
71
good battery power (440 shots)
includes touch focus
good resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (216g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography info
Sony QX1 Landscape photography info
58
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (650 shots)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
64
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
good battery power (440 shots)
small screen ( inch)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
Sony QX1 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
32
has touchscreen
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition in class (216 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony QX1
 Olympus E-520Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-520 Sony Alpha QX1
Category Entry-Level DSLR Lens-style
Announced 2008-08-20 2014-09-03
Body design Compact SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 5456 x 3632
Max native ISO 1600 16000
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch -
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 grams (1.22 lbs) 216 grams (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 images 440 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $400 $500