Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af71a/af71a6cc86af4bb245f8a93f9d5f9877a2de49e3" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and H90 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and H90 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 4 years before the H90 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H90 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-520 grades against the H90 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony H90
E-520 | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the Olympus E-520
H90 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 42 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony H90
E-520 | H90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony H90 has specifications of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 and the H90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54153/54153d025b532bc08713323c37f6077e2d84c0ce" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and H90 is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd8b9/fd8b958bce6bd2632bac8b70936b2681c6265684" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and H90.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony H90 will offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f7db/9f7db9bcb2adebe8bc6ba8d3092fbc7af73b0df0" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95924/9592415d756c002dd2251483e1f0408b1b6a8f6a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony H90 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 290 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $400 | $230 |