Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-520 versus Sony HX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the HX1 (9MP) is relatively well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was brought out 8 months earlier than the HX1 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-520 grades versus the HX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony HX1
E-520 | HX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-520
HX1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2009 | August 2008 | Newer by 8 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony HX1
E-520 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony HX1 has specifications of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 versus Sony HX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 compared to the HX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and HX1 is 68 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and HX1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-520 will give extra detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2009-04-22 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 544 grams (1.20 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $400 | $47,999 |