Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b24d7/b24d7d58bda9363e0bc59b94985873a84db39b53" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the S2100 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and S2100 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 16 months before the S2100 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony S2100 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-520 grades against the S2100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony S2100
E-520 | S2100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Olympus E-520
S2100 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 16 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony S2100
E-520 | S2100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 comes with outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Sony S2100 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 and the S2100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73fac/73fac1aaf7103015ef1e4bf1b9d2cd1ef839660e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and S2100 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73067/730673c60fa5e168bfb2f232ea32d8fdd72f77c0" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and S2100.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony S2100 will result in more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c065/9c065bdb9687caa44b83f245e9fde02aadc19300" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dd68/5dd68c96cfa4f71eaedf7603875920ee888c644c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $400 | $0 |