Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44


96 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced February 2012

Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TX20 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TX20 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

The E-520 was introduced 4 years before the TX20 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony TX20 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-520 matches up against the TX20 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Sony TX20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony TX20
E-520 | TX20 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX20 over the Olympus E-520
TX20 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 42 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony TX20
E-520 | TX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Sony TX20 has dimensions of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 compared to the TX20.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and TX20 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TX20.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony TX20 will result in more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX20 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 133 gr (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | 250 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $400 | $330 |