Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-520 and Sony TX200V, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was launched 4 years prior to the TX200V and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-520 matches up versus the TX200V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony TX200V
| E-520 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-520
| TX200V | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | August 2008 | Fresher by 41 months |
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony TX200V
| E-520 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 and Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-520 compared to the TX200V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and TX200V is 68 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TX200V.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Sony TX200V will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-520 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2008-08-20 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $400 | $500 |