Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-600 and Olympus E-PM2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-600 was unveiled 4 years prior to the E-PM2 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-600 scores against the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus E-PM2
E-600 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-600
E-PM2 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 45 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus E-PM2
E-600 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-600 and Olympus E-PM2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-600 compared to the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61f00/61f00dd6cede5deaf0dce31459ed0c15919dc6fd" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and E-PM2 is 71 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2523/b2523755941d82328cc2b512902f4b1bc3d2c891" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and E-PM2.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus E-PM2 to result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-600 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3baec/3baecf0e327d6b14ea6982940c2dc5ae199e23fa" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c2fb/2c2fb3987dfc812540c256dd5e76127885eeec12" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-08-30 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 541 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 360 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $448 |