Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is fairly similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-600 was released 8 months after the SP-565UZ so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-600 matches up against the SP-565UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-600 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-600 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-600
SP-565UZ | E-600 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-600 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-600 against the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65e4b/65e4b22c476a471f4507d2cb75cf7cdd2c6fc0e1" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and SP-565UZ is 71 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b81/e2b81d1c1663203094f5a24e7071e44e57a5f08d" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The image here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and SP-565UZ.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-600 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-600 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-600 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00fa5/00fa57bec828c5f11e303adb52a28d91b499f5fc" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84604/8460419be45cbf31caf982964296737feac754e8" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-08-30 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515g (1.14 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 541 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $400 |