Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-600 and Olympus 8010, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is pretty comparable but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-600 was introduced 5 months earlier than the 8010 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-600 scores vs the 8010 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus 8010
E-600 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-600
8010 | E-600 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus 8010
E-600 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2009 | ![]() | February 2010 | Same age |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has sizing of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-600 and Olympus 8010 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-600 versus the 8010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3483/d3483cbd0851ee89176dd8c47fdf3af511f3999e" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and 8010 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7a09/d7a099588f4000c6d8b68357afca38cf1da32a50" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and 8010.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-600 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus 8010 will provide greater detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e1d7/6e1d75e0506b4ba1669c39428ae956168333bfc3" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdf1f/cdf1fe47b0dcc66db0cd15728387e038a98c99a8" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $600 |