Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-600 was released 5 years prior to the TG-850 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-600 matches up vs the TG-850 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-600 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-600
TG-850 iHS | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-600 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-600 against the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f446/1f4468903cd9f50bc21a782b36b662e56096306f" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and TG-850 iHS is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7397a/7397a4608c1b3d85a0ed17792cb44cfab045b938" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and TG-850 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-600 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd034/bd034eb52dc39ac3f1594b9ff29d29d4ccff3790" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/131a7/131a7e6c0453a9417b7f51a6c2faaae1783764b2" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-08-30 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515g (1.14 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $250 |