Clicky

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-600 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-600
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Announced August 2009
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview

The following is a complete review of the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-600 was released 5 years prior to the TG-850 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-600 matches up vs the TG-850 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS

 E-600 TG-850 iHS 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-600

 TG-850 iHS E-600 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014August 2009Newer by 53 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-850 iHS

 E-600 TG-850 iHS 
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-600 against the TG-850 iHS.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and TG-850 iHS is 71 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and TG-850 iHS.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-600 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-600
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
35
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-600 Street photography details
Olympus TG-850 iHS Street photography details
76
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
69
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-600
Sports photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (4.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (500 CIPA)
51
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery life (330 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-600 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-850 iHS Travel photography details
53
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (500 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
72
better than average battery life (330 per charge)
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-600 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography highlights
53
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low MP (12MP)
low battery pack (500 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
50
reasonably wide (21mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proofing
better than average battery life (330 per charge)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Vlogging camera
18
lack of video recording
33
reasonably wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
 Olympus E-600Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-600 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2009-08-30 2014-01-29
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4616 x 3464
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 7 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 1/2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per second 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 515g (1.14 lbs) 218g (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 541 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 330 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval))
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $250