Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-600 was unveiled 4 years before the TG-2 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-600 scores versus the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-600 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-600
| TG-2 iHS | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 | August 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-600 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 has got exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-600 against the TG-2 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and TG-2 iHS is 71 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-600 uses the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The more aged E-600 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $380 |