Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-600 was unveiled 4 years before the TG-2 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-600 scores versus the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-600 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-600
| TG-2 iHS | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 | August 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-600 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 has got exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-600 against the TG-2 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and TG-2 iHS is 71 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-600 uses the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The more aged E-600 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $380 |