Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus VG-160, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very well matched but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-600 was released 3 years prior to the VG-160 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-600 scores versus the VG-160 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-600 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus VG-160
E-600 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-600
VG-160 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus VG-160
E-600 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus VG-160 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-600 against the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0c9f/c0c9fbd483d231b54d6558a33e8cc9c5f81128f9" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and VG-160 is 71 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f344/1f3448475361d6644b0280b5630ce68ea5ee8235" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and VG-160.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-600 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-600 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2905/f290583545bd7d01d6e07df3faa3552bf63ee66a" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61c3f/61c3f9a07c324f6a55f94a89af9a51c474a785c9" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Olympus VG-160 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-08-30 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 165 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $90 |