Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-600 and Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-600 was introduced 17 months earlier than the VR-330 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-600 scores against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus VR-330
E-600 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-600
VR-330 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus VR-330
E-600 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-600 and Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-600 versus the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6191/f6191ab7d874b971adde1ecddfd217d4a3f29dd8" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and VR-330 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e02aa/e02aa107b42d82c143f963a51eaca832145f08a6" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and VR-330.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-600 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VR-330 will render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-600 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/555f9/555f9d235e1ada3e7aaf6c566994ce1ee7371115" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f019/5f01989ac7322825df44a68040640c756caaffdf" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Olympus VR-330 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-08-30 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $220 |