Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-600 was launched 4 months earlier than the FH3 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-600 scores versus the FH3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Panasonic FH3
| E-600 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-600
| FH3 | E-600 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Panasonic FH3
| E-600 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 | January 2010 | Same age | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Panasonic FH3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-600 and the FH3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and FH3 is 71 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and FH3.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-600 due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FH3 will render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 515g (1.14 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $160 |