Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Photography Glossary Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-600 was launched 4 months earlier than the FH3 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-600 scores versus the FH3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Panasonic FH3
| E-600 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-600
| FH3 | E-600 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Panasonic FH3
| E-600 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 | January 2010 | Same age | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Panasonic FH3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-600 and the FH3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and FH3 is 71 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and FH3.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-600 due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FH3 will render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 515g (1.14 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $160 |