Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-ZX1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-600 versus Panasonic ZR1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is very well matched but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-600 was unveiled 2 months later than the ZR1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-600 scores vs the ZR1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-600 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Panasonic ZR1
| E-600 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-600
| ZR1 | E-600 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Panasonic ZR1
| E-600 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-600 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-600 versus Panasonic ZR1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-600 vs the ZR1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and ZR1 is 71 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and ZR1.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-600 features the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF easier.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-08-30 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $280 |