Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d60/91d606f8f15554d192c44ec0e68c877e6a1eff9a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is very close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-600 was unveiled 4 months later than the ZS3 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-600 grades vs the ZS3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-600 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Panasonic ZS3
E-600 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-600
ZS3 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Panasonic ZS3
E-600 | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2009 | ![]() | May 2009 | Same age |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS3 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-600 and the ZS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7cf7/e7cf7e374446af9e99578e4f698dd0c62f144fc3" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and ZS3 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/239ad/239ad64b63b4ef27e7fe34b7d1551f5d40a016f4" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and ZS3.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-600 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-600 will result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d11/03d11728a01b18bfa0e7f58b53a4c4405eb9a3a1" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92be0/92be0672e27e07be5c80fcc4df2af2a79d645e10" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-08-30 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 pounds) | 229 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $200 |