Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b96/79b9603f77f7c51f1ac0c53523d43d29d519fd6f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front"
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-600 versus Panasonic ZS35, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-600 was announced 5 years before the ZS35 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-600 matches up against the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-600 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-600
ZS35 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Panasonic ZS35
E-600 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 features outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-600 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-600 vs the ZS35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a2fd/8a2fd2c0426ad4bfa3dd9b0dc6947cb24a94e1d6" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and ZS35 is 71 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc93/bcc938d85a089280758b075c8c6eb060f17e8658" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and ZS35.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-600 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e423c/e423c7010326c1eaa5662591e3d241e8500d31a4" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/561d1/561d166dd5bb6bf95589d9e238380469607a9693" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $0 | $300 |