Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f10a/6f10a47131c9d5756aa9d066ef058620213d1e35" alt="Pentax K-30 front Pentax K-30 front"
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Released October 2012
- Successor is Pentax K-50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-600 and Pentax K-30, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and K-30 (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and K-30 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-600 was introduced 4 years before the K-30 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax K-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-600 scores vs the K-30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 and Pentax K-30. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Pentax K-30
E-600 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus E-600
K-30 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 38 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Pentax K-30
E-600 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-30 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-600 and Pentax K-30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-600 vs the K-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20d84/20d84d48f58d7230c799d7270b4af7caed5e51e5" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and K-30 is 71 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17fb2/17fb2806110075dd2a4c6062272f02035a98e813" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and K-30.
Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Pentax K-30 will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-600 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2af26/2af26ed6df81429f29f8aeceb9b61b028e14eb5c" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1507d/1507dff52a3806f0e9c40606b4b5ae4d25b071ba" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Pentax K-30 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-08-30 | 2012-10-29 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Prime M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lb) | 650 gr (1.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 410 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $525 |