Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-600 versus Pentax MX-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-600 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the MX-1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-600 matches up vs the MX-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Pentax MX-1
| E-600 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-600
| MX-1 | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | August 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Pentax MX-1
| E-600 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 has external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Olympus E-600 versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-600 against the MX-1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and MX-1 is 71 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The picture below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and MX-1.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-600 has got the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-600 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515g (1.14 lb) | 391g (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $400 |