Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-600 versus Pentax MX-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-600 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the MX-1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-600 matches up vs the MX-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Pentax MX-1
| E-600 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-600
| MX-1 | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | August 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Pentax MX-1
| E-600 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 has external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Olympus E-600 versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-600 against the MX-1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and MX-1 is 71 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The picture below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and MX-1.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-600 has got the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-600 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515g (1.14 lb) | 391g (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $400 |