Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-600 and Pentax Q-S1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-600 was brought out 5 years earlier than the Q-S1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-600 scores against the Q-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-600 & Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-600 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-600
Q-S1 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 60 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Pentax Q-S1
E-600 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 offers outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-600 and Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-600 compared to the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b426/1b4266d3c2f30c21bae6a54d71a01117174071a9" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and Q-S1 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5014/a50140f70dd09d2981ac288d732a18321f1cfeca" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The E-600 provides the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-600 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1db5e/1db5e8fe8b243ca3bea4df1d7594759f157919a4" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0032a/0032a1718e7683b6f93b1393d0f2cb192a4632d8" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 250 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $250 |