Clicky

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
71
Imaging
46
Features
50
Overall
47
Olympus E-600 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
56
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus E-600
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-600 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-600 was revealed 4 years before the GR and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-600 grades vs the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Ricoh GR

 E-600 GR 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-600

 GR E-600 
LaunchedApril 2013August 2009More recent by 44 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Ricoh GR

 E-600 GR 
Focus manually More exact focus
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 enjoys exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-600 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-600 versus the GR.

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and GR is 71 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and GR.

To sum up, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-600 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-600 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-600 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
59
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
73
manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-600 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Street photography info
76
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-600
Sports photography with Ricoh GR
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps low (4.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery power (500 shots)
44
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-600 Travel photography features
Ricoh GR Travel photography features
53
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery power (500 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
71
lighter than average in class (245g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-600 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Landscape photography information
53
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery power (500 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
61
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-600
Vlogging with Ricoh GR
18
can't record video
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
no external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-600 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus E-600Ricoh GR
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-600 Ricoh GR
Class Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-08-30 2013-04-17
Body design Compact SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 7 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 300 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 515 gr (1.14 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 78
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 13.5
DXO Low light score 541 972
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 290 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $0 $971