Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-600 and Samsung MV800, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-600 was introduced 24 months prior to the MV800 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-600 matches up against the MV800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 and Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Samsung MV800
| E-600 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-600
| MV800 | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | August 2009 | Newer by 24 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Samsung MV800
| E-600 | MV800 |
|---|
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 features outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has sizing of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-600 and Samsung MV800 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-600 vs the MV800.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and MV800 is 71 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and MV800.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung MV800 will show more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-600 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Samsung MV800 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $499 |