Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Older Model is Sigma SD9
- Successor is Sigma SD14
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and SD10 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-600 was manufactured 5 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-600 matches up versus the SD10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 and Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sigma SD10
| E-600 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 | March 2004 | Fresher by 67 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper screen (+100k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus E-600
| SD10 | E-600 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sigma SD10
| E-600 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-600 compared to the SD10.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and SD10 is 71 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and SD10.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-600 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-600 will give you extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher E-600 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-600 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus E-600 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
| Available lenses | 45 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 515 gr (1.14 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $198 |