Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-600 was manufactured 11 months earlier than the A390 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-600 grades against the A390 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony A390
| E-600 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-600
| A390 | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony A390
| E-600 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-600 and the A390.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and A390 is 71 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and A390.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-600 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-600 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2010-07-28 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515g (1.14 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 230 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $500 |