Clicky

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-600 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-600
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Introduced October 2015
  • Replaced the Sony RX1R
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Below is a extensive review of the Olympus E-600 versus Sony RX1R II, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) feature different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-600 was launched 7 years before the RX1R II and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-600 scores versus the RX1R II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony RX1R II

 E-600 RX1R II 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-600

 RX1R II E-600 
IntroducedOctober 2015August 2009More recent by 74 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony RX1R II

 E-600 RX1R II 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-600 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-600 versus Sony RX1R II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-600 against the RX1R II.

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and RX1R II is 71 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and RX1R II.

As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-600 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony RX1R II will render extra detail utilizing its extra 30 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-600 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-600 Portrait photography details
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography details
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
85
you can focus manually
above average flash sync (1/4,000s)
sensor resolution is great (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-600
Street photography with Sony RX1R II
76
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
73
has a tilting screen
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
very good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (507 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-600 Sports photography factors
Sony RX1R II Sports photography factors
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (500 shots)
63
sensor resolution is great (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
has tracking autofocus
supports phase detect AF
focal length is fixed (35mm)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
bad battery life (220 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-600 Travel photography factors
Sony RX1R II Travel photography factors
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
no Timelapse function
terrible battery (500 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
59
sensor resolution is great (42 megapixels)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Time Lapse function
bad battery life (220 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (507 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-600 Landscape photography details
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography details
53
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery (500 shots)
no Timelapse function
68
you can focus manually
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
sensor resolution is great (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
does not have anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
bad battery life (220 per charge)
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX1R II as a Vlogging camera
18
no video
34
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external mic port
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (507 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-600 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-600 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus E-600Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-600 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Type Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-08-30 2015-10-13
Body design Compact SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 42MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Highest enhanced ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 7 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0
Macro focusing range - 14cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 515 grams (1.14 pounds) 507 grams (1.12 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 97
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 13.9
DXO Low light rating 541 3204
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 220 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $0 $3,300