Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-600 versus Sony W290, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the W290 (12MP) is very similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and W290 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-600 was released 7 months after the W290 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-600 scores against the W290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-600 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony W290
| E-600 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus E-600
| W290 | E-600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony W290
| E-600 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Sony W290 has measurements of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-600 versus Sony W290 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-600 versus the W290.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and W290 is 71 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and W290.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor dimensions. The E-600 uses the larger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF easier. The newer E-600 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-08-30 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515g (1.14 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $230 |