Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-620 and Olympus FE-4000, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FE-4000 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-620 was introduced at a similar time to the FE-4000 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-620 matches up against the FE-4000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Olympus FE-4000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus FE-4000
| E-620 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-620
| FE-4000 | E-620 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus FE-4000
| E-620 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 |  | July 2009 | Same age |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 provides outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus FE-4000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-620 compared to the FE-4000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and FE-4000 is 71 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and FE-4000.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-620 has got the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh easier.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also called as | - | X-925 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 136 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $799 | $130 |