Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-935
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-620 and Olympus FE-5020, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FE-5020 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was launched at a similar time to the FE-5020 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-620 matches up against the FE-5020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus FE-5020. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus FE-5020
| E-620 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-620
| FE-5020 | E-620 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus FE-5020
| E-620 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 has got external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 and Olympus FE-5020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 compared to the FE-5020.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and FE-5020 is 71 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and FE-5020.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-620 contains the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Otherwise known as | - | X-935 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 137g (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $799 | $160 |