Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both built by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-620 was brought out 8 years prior to the E-M1 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 grades versus the E-M1 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-620 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-620
E-M1 II | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 87 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M1 II
E-620 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-620 and the E-M1 II.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and E-M1 II is 71 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and E-M1 II.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus E-M1 II to provide you with extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 574 grams (1.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Retail price | $799 | $1,700 |