Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both built by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-620 was brought out 8 years prior to the E-M1 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 grades versus the E-M1 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-620 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-620

 E-M1 II E-620 
LaunchedSeptember 2016July 2009Newer by 87 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M1 II

 E-620 E-M1 II 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

See the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-620 and the E-M1 II.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and E-M1 II is 71 and 68 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and E-M1 II.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus E-M1 II to provide you with extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
75
focusing manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
supports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
76
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
includes focus by touch
environment proofing
lighter than average (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 shots)
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
high max fps (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
has phase detect auto focus
low battery pack (350 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-620
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (500 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
72
lighter than average (574g)
environment proofing
includes focus by touch
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
low battery pack (350 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
53
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (500 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
76
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
two card slots
low battery pack (350 per charge)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
18
can't record video
79
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
great video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external microphone socket
lighter than average (574 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Olympus E-620Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-620 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Type Entry-Level DSLR Pro Mirrorless
Released 2009-07-06 2016-09-19
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 7 121
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second 60.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution None 4096x2160
Video file format - MOV, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500 grams (1.10 lb) 574 grams (1.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 80
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 12.8
DXO Low light rating 536 1312
Other
Battery life 500 photos 350 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Card slots One Dual
Retail price $799 $1,700