Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M10 IV, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and E-M10 IV (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-620 was revealed 12 years earlier than the E-M10 IV which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-620 scores vs the E-M10 IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
E-620 | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus E-620
E-M10 IV | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2020 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 134 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M10 IV
E-620 | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 IV has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-M10 IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-620 vs the E-M10 IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85e54/85e54bbd3c8973603001a8f1e757c0ed9b4e357e" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and E-M10 IV is 71 and 81 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48578/4857825f2b31f6df2fc7e06b148b0b74b1b709e2" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and E-M10 IV.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus E-M10 IV to deliver extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e2e/24e2e42853c3cb437a89a27c5e7fd77f76adeca8" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c94a6/c94a6e908cf7185aa59f69e70fb00f04dc4ec0ef" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2020-08-04 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 8.7 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 360 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $799 | $699 |