Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-620 was manufactured 9 years prior to the E-PL9 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-620 scores versus the E-PL9 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-PL9
E-620 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus E-620
E-PL9 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 104 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus E-PL9
E-620 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the E-PL9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/890a5/890a5751a2e4f2447860d13a090f5b1748af3d60" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and E-PL9 is 71 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc88c/cc88c1973b85e9989a081014c432c15b7f4cc3e0" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and E-PL9.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-PL9 to produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b4f4/8b4f495357ac454dc58b0d0e4d75ac0acd61d53d" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33283/3328358e582d1225cc6bf87e39a29506182152cd" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lb) | 380 gr (0.84 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 350 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $799 | $599 |