Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
![Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-620.jpg)
![Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-565UZ/Olympus-SP-565UZ-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The E-620 was manufactured 6 months later than the SP-565UZ which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-620 scores vs the SP-565UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-620 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-620
SP-565UZ | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-620 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-620 versus the SP-565UZ.
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and SP-565UZ is 71 and 72 respectively.
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-620 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-620 will result in extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 536 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $799 | $400 |