Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb371/bb3715e653b80d81ca1f91b80f208bb4b165bff6" alt="Olympus SZ-11 front Olympus SZ-11 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-11, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and SZ-11 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-620 was revealed 3 years prior to the SZ-11 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-620 matches up against the SZ-11 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-11. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus SZ-11
E-620 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Olympus E-620
SZ-11 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-11
E-620 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-11 has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-11 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 and the SZ-11.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7a02/d7a0262c0e84972d72caa6eaee81afa889a7e968" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and SZ-11 is 71 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f747/8f747113cb7646470408b183b740a306f2f23a66" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and SZ-11.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SZ-11 will show more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c06e6/c06e6f217243bb2c773394e61bac97f30405325b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8623/e8623403370787820af376965d99f0efd0e64f80" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus SZ-11 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 200 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $799 | $253 |