Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Olympus SZ-30MR front
Portability
89
Imaging
39
Features
39
Overall
39

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Launched July 2009
Olympus SZ-30MR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Released March 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-30MR, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and SZ-30MR (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and SZ-30MR (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-620 was unveiled 20 months earlier than the SZ-30MR which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-30MR being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-620 scores vs the SZ-30MR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus SZ-30MR

 E-620 SZ-30MR 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Olympus E-620

 SZ-30MR E-620 
ReleasedMarch 2011July 2009More recent by 20 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-30MR

 E-620 SZ-30MR 
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 has external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-30MR has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-30MR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 and the SZ-30MR.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and SZ-30MR is 71 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and SZ-30MR.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SZ-30MR will resolve extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography details
Olympus SZ-30MR Portrait photography details
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography features
Olympus SZ-30MR Street photography features
76
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (226g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography factors
Olympus SZ-30MR Sports photography factors
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
slow fps (4.0 fps)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
41
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
max fps low (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery life (220 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography information
Olympus SZ-30MR Travel photography information
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
missing Time Lapse function
bad battery (500 per charge)
resolution not great (12MP)
65
lighter than others in class (226 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery life (220 shots)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography info
Olympus SZ-30MR Landscape photography info
53
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse function
41
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery life (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging features
Olympus SZ-30MR Vlogging features
18
no video
34
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (226g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Olympus SZ-30MR
 Olympus E-620Olympus SZ-30MR
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-620 Olympus SZ-30MR
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-06 2011-03-02
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 7 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1700 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500g (1.10 lb) 226g (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots 220 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $799 $279