Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 8000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-620 was announced within a month of the 8000 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-620 scores against the 8000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus 8000
E-620 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-620
8000 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 8000
E-620 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Same generation |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 features outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 versus the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1075/a107591803c7986d0dd2d9224815126444984938" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and 8000 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e6d2/9e6d2bd41cb3bea0655c88e0b48d0ec23bafb1e6" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The picture below will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and 8000.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-620 has the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF less difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67b0a/67b0a463b3a91404bc82ba7396bf36f0c90a2b4b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf2c/4cf2c1e84a89f89a13ddfb49fa85ecd8563e5842" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 182g (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $799 | $380 |