Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Revealed February 2019
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus 6020 versus Panasonic FZ1000 II, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and FZ1000 II (20MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") posses different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was brought out 10 years before the FZ1000 II and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 6020 scores against the FZ1000 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
6020 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus 6020
FZ1000 II | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2019 | February 2010 | Fresher by 110 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
6020 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 II has dimensions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") along with a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 versus Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the 6020 and the FZ1000 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and FZ1000 II is 95 and 55 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and FZ1000 II.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 6020 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will offer extra detail having its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lb) | 808 gr (1.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $279 | $898 |