Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus 8010, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-620 was unveiled 7 months before the 8010 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-620 matches up vs the 8010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus 8010
E-620 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-620
8010 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus 8010
E-620 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has proportions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus 8010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 compared to the 8010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c037/5c037f1e130c6cc141a8ad50ffc8da920397a37e" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and 8010 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63738/63738f0144925fc76f43b61498adfea5830fec21" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The image underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and 8010.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus 8010 will give you more detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f331/4f331a3a4047ec30d701c2d70b3e1c68e2f9b9e4" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e86a/4e86a7c4e9b876fa9469317e1d9ca204fc679055" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $600 |