Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus TG-870, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-620 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the TG-870 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-620 matches up against the TG-870 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-870
E-620 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-620
TG-870 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 79 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-870
E-620 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-620 vs the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/171c9/171c9bbaf8ddfe050bc8a294b518ba7fa84de9bd" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and TG-870 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43b2c/43b2c10c556fa6bcd3d4fe6e6e7755fcf9725981" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and TG-870.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df930/df9306484cb136eb599ae0e4893b2484388dcb40" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78a41/78a41bdbda661ec6209d9d352f8e30f5bd3de55e" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $799 | $280 |