Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-620 was revealed 3 years prior to the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-620 scores vs the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-620 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-620
TG-820 iHS | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-620 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 vs the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/901be/901beb3a29bfe093c2cd5b2f3d7ff289bb00da21" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and TG-820 iHS is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49ba3/49ba317ab93129b4de4850574aa8bf875863859b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The photograph below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-620 features the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f6be/2f6bea5f4c96f1583a695c2747bf30b57d856ff7" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/281d0/281d060c176cbc9fa342812394e09320d5ee90e6" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 220 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $799 | $500 |