Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-620 was brought out 3 years earlier than the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-620 scores versus the TG-1 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-620 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-620
TG-1 iHS | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 34 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-620 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-620 and the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3833b/3833ba206e5828dd3be1cfba2487cf8dd9a13466" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and TG-1 iHS is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aa26/8aa26f886f28e1debf58a19b43ffe003984bcc6b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The E-620 provides the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-620 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e6b/94e6bbfee3b9dcca929260eaf292d69bdebe279d" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c4f8/0c4f8ed3f077b1551bd711af22f7c87e33e2cba1" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $799 | $399 |