Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5
Portability
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Later Model is Olympus TG-6
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus TG-5, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-620 was announced 8 years earlier than the TG-5 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-620 scores against the TG-5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-5
| E-620 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-620
| TG-5 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 95 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-5
| E-620 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus TG-5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-620 and the TG-5.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and TG-5 is 71 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and TG-5.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit different sensor sizing. The E-620 uses the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The older E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-620 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-5 Portrait photography features
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focus
delivers RAW files
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-620 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Street photography camera
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (250g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus E-620 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps very slow (4.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
low battery life (500 CIPA)
high fps (20.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
good battery life (340 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-620 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Travel photography camera
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
no Time Lapse mode
low battery life (500 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
good battery life (340 per charge)
weather proof
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (250g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-620 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-5 Landscape photography details
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
megapixel count low (12MP)
low battery life (500 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
you can focus manually
quite wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
good battery life (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Vlogging camera
lack of video recording
quite wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2017-05-17 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 340 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $799 | $449 |