Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-6, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-620 was released 11 years before the TG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-620 matches up vs the TG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus Tough TG-6. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-6
E-620 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-620
TG-6 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2019 | July 2009 | Newer by 120 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-6
E-620 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-6 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-620 compared to the TG-6.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and TG-6 is 71 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and TG-6.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-620 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh easier. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2019-05-22 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) | 253 grams (0.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 340 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $449 |