Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47


90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-6, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

The E-620 was released 11 years before the TG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-620 matches up vs the TG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus Tough TG-6. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus TG-6
E-620 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-620
TG-6 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2019 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 120 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-6
E-620 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Olympus TG-6 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-620 compared to the TG-6.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and TG-6 is 71 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and TG-6.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-620 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh easier. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2019-05-22 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) | 253 grams (0.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 340 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $449 |