Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-110, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-620 was brought out 19 months earlier than the VG-110 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-620 matches up vs the VG-110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VG-110
E-620 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-620
VG-110 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-110
E-620 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 has got exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the VG-110.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and VG-110 is 71 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and VG-110.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The E-620 features the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 105g (0.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 170 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $150 |