Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VG-120 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-620 was unveiled 18 months prior to the VG-120 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-620 grades against the VG-120 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Olympus VG-120. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VG-120
E-620 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-620
VG-120 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-120
E-620 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 has got external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-120 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-620 and the VG-120.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and VG-120 is 71 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and VG-120.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus VG-120 will provide more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-120 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 120g (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 160 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $799 | $190 |