Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-620 was announced 3 years prior to the VG-145 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the E-620 scores against the VG-145 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VG-145
E-620 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-620
VG-145 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-145
E-620 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the VG-145.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f094f/f094fe6255714cc98ebb1ea0f16563b0fd41d7d9" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and VG-145 is 71 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4254d/4254d75f522fed3ba837e574265e6fe90ed24849" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and VG-145.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VG-145 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6c6c/f6c6cb9d70b11b9aa15119c8e7d8146de181fdb0" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9db6e/9db6e1ce3b3f11b3b08cb742407f0195c5625f47" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 120 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 160 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $0 |