Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was announced 3 years prior to the VG-145 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the E-620 scores against the VG-145 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VG-145
E-620 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-620
VG-145 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 25 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-145
E-620 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the VG-145.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and VG-145 is 71 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and VG-145.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VG-145 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 120 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 160 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $0 |