Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-620 was announced 3 years prior to the VG-160 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-620 grades versus the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VG-160
E-620 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-620
VG-160 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-160
E-620 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18893/18893cd7a47fced7a46abe3b08f1808aeacb3071" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and VG-160 is 71 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a582/9a58201a212c97c1ae9e34ec43a3d91a02f64d0a" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The photograph here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and VG-160.
All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will provide more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9097/e909734a06efb1ea5e88d07ed2932179863d81eb" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/225a4/225a4284472ad1a76e6bfe2f5ac950353e5bf5eb" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 165 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $90 |