Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-620 was announced 3 years prior to the VG-160 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-620 grades versus the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VG-160

 E-620 VG-160 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-620

 VG-160 E-620 
IntroducedJanuary 2012July 2009Fresher by 30 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-160

 E-620 VG-160 
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the VG-160.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and VG-160 is 71 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The photograph here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and VG-160.

All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will provide more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography info
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography info
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
34
MP count decent (14MP)
has face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-620
Street photography with Olympus VG-160
76
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
56
lighter than competition (125g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography info
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography info
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
slow fps (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
not so great battery pack (500 shots)
27
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (165 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography features
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography features
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (500 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
66
lighter than competition (125 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (165 shots)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
53
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (500 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
37
pretty wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery pack (165 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
18
no video
30
pretty wide (26mm)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (125g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus E-620Olympus VG-160
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-620 Olympus VG-160
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-06 2012-01-10
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 7 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 7cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500g (1.10 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 165 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $799 $90