Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Revealed July 2009
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus VR-330, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-620 was launched 19 months prior to the VR-330 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-620 scores vs the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-620 VR-330 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-620

 VR-330 E-620 
IntroducedFebruary 2011July 2009Fresher by 19 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus VR-330

 E-620 VR-330 
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 offers external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-620 versus Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-620 compared to the VR-330.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and VR-330 is 71 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and VR-330.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-330 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-620
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
33
MP count good (14MP)
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-620
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
76
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography info
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
53
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
70
lighter than competition (158 grams)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography information
53
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
low MP (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
42
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Olympus VR-330
18
no video
32
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
lighter than competition (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus E-620Olympus VR-330
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-620 Olympus VR-330
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-06 2011-02-08
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 7 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 grams (1.10 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $799 $220