Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Announced July 2009
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-620 was introduced 18 months prior to the XZ-1 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-620 grades vs the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus XZ-1

 E-620 XZ-1 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-620

 XZ-1 E-620 
LaunchedJanuary 2011July 2009More modern by 18 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kCrisper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus XZ-1

 E-620 XZ-1 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 vs the XZ-1.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and XZ-1 is 71 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and XZ-1.

Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-620 will give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-620
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
45
has manual focus
supports face detection focus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-620
Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
76
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
more heavy than competition (275 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (4.0 frames per second)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery life (500 per charge)
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery (320 CIPA)
slow fps (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography information
53
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery life (500 shots)
low MP (12MP)
62
better than average battery (320 shots)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (275 grams)
low megapixels (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography info
53
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inch)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery life (500 shots)
missing Time Lapse recording
54
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (320 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging advice
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging advice
18
lack of video recording
31
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (275 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus E-620Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-620 Olympus XZ-1
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-06 2011-01-26
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 3664 x 2752
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 7 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500g (1.10 pounds) 275g (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 34
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 10.4
DXO Low light rating 536 117
Other
Battery life 500 photos 320 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $799 $567