Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-620 was introduced 18 months prior to the XZ-1 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-620 grades vs the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus XZ-1
| E-620 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-620
| XZ-1 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus XZ-1
| E-620 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 vs the XZ-1.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and XZ-1 is 71 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-620 will give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 320 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $799 | $567 |