Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-620 was introduced 18 months prior to the XZ-1 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-620 grades vs the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus XZ-1
| E-620 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-620
| XZ-1 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus XZ-1
| E-620 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 vs the XZ-1.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and XZ-1 is 71 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-620 will give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 320 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $799 | $567 |