Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-620 was introduced 18 months prior to the XZ-1 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-620 grades vs the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus XZ-1
E-620 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-620
XZ-1 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus XZ-1
E-620 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 vs the XZ-1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and XZ-1 is 71 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-620 will give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 320 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $799 | $567 |