Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") come with different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-620 was unveiled 9 years prior to the ZS200 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-620 grades vs the ZS200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-620 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-620
ZS200 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | July 2009 | More modern by 104 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic ZS200
E-620 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 has got external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-620 vs the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and ZS200 is 71 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-620 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 370 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $799 | $800 |